Judicial Bricolage: The Use of Foreign Precedents by Constitutional Judges in the 21st Century (Hart Studies in Comparative Public Law)

This book represents a unique contribution to comparative legal studies by presenting the results of an empirical research project on the use of foreign precedents in constitutional interpretation in 31 jurisdictions worldwide. It expands and updates the outcomes presented in the previous successful book The Use of Foreign Precedents by Constitutional Judges, edited by Tania Groppi and Marie-Claire Ponthoreau and published in 2013 as Volume 1 of the series Hart Studies in Comparative Public Law. This new research, covering countries from all the continents, with special attention to some of the emerging jurisdictions of the Global South, confirms that the practice of making explicit use of foreign precedents is still limited both quantitatively and qualitatively.Judicial dialogue only exists in common law jurisdictions and, even there, ‘judicial bricolage’ is much more common than ‘judicial comparativism’.Since the previous edition, this practice has gone hand in hand with new developm